<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Tahoma">Mike,<br>
<br>
Thanks. After sending that observation, I checked online. Hz
became official in 1960, with the formation of the International
System of Units, but it sure was a long time before anyone I knew
was referring to kilohertz instead of kilocycles.<br>
<br>
Steve<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/24/13 11:31 AM, Mike wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:4hhtem3cmw3q0e8bk9bu53wn.1387902673775@email.android.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div>Steve,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>That's right! When was it, 60s or early 70s when we switched
from cps to Hz?</div>
<div>
<div style="font-size:100%"><br>
-mike<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
Steve White <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Steve.White@800CallNow.com"><Steve.White@800CallNow.com></a> wrote:<br>
<font face="Tahoma">James,<br>
<br>
Thanks very much for the details. <br>
<br>
I'm certain the DVD originated as 16:9 and probably as HD
because I've seen a reference to the fact that they were
recording for release in both Blu-Ray and DVD. I saw the show
when it aired live on CBS a couple of weeks ago in some flavor
of high definition.<br>
<br>
I'm always impressed by the knowledge this group possesses, but
suppose this is what you guys do, after all. I managed to keep
an RCA CT-100 alive for several years in the early to mid-60s
using components from the same chassis incarnated as a Conrac
monitor. The two cost me $75.00 and provided some serious fun
and challenges...not the least of which was moving them from DC
to Fitchburg, Mass and then to Charlotte, NC. Can't believe I
didn't find a way to hold on to them.<br>
<br>
I suppose I can claim partial credit for my recollections from
those days regarding the color subcarrier? To put a VERY fine
point on things, were we using the term hertz/Hz when stating a
frequency back then, or did that term work its way into common
use sometime later?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Steve<br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/23/13 1:24 PM, James Snyder
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:p06240801cede2d4f5025@%5B192.168.1.36%5D"
type="cite">Steve, <br>
<br>
Strictly speaking, no DVD can be "NTSC" since NTSC was the 525
line analog television standard and DVDs are, by their nature,
digital TV delivery media in the 480 line format in the former
"NTSC" countries (using MPEG-2 video compression), and 576
format in the former PAL & SECAM countries. However, "NTSC"
has become a colloquialism for "480 line video" and is thus
misused constantly. <br>
<br>
The difference between NTSC and 480 being that, since digital
signals don't need horizontal or vertical blanking intervals,
the extra lines used for those timing signals for analog CRTs
are not included in digital video. There were 45 lines of
blanking in NTSC. Same with 576: the H and V blanking lines in
625 line video aren't needed in digital TV and are thus not
included in the digital signals. <br>
<br>
DVDs have the ability to reproduce 16:9 (1.78:1) aspect ratio
video, so if the people on your Garth Brooks DVD don't look
squished, most likely the video was orginated in 16:9 480 line
digital video. I can't imagine anybody creating anything in
actual NTSC analog today. It would look like crap with all the
analog artifacts. <br>
<br>
Hope this helps, <br>
<br>
James <br>
------------------------------------------------ <br>
James Snyder <br>
Senior Systems Administrator <br>
Library of Congress - <br>
National Audio Visual Conservation Center (NAVCC) <br>
Motion Picture, Broadcasting & Recorded Sound Division
(MBRS) <br>
Packard Campus for Audio Visual Conservation <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.loc.gov/avconservation/packard/">http://www.loc.gov/avconservation/packard/</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Thanks for the opportunity to ask, can
someone help me get a better grasp of DVD vs Blu-Ray formats?
<br>
<br>
I recently received a video disc labeled as an NTSC DVD of the
Garth Brooks "Blame It All On My Roots" performance in Las
Vegas. Playback on my Blu-Ray deck displays as full screen on
a new Panasonic plasma screen capable of 1080p without obvious
aspect ratio distortions. <br>
<br>
Garth's performance is incredible; lighting, camera work,
audio, direction all are great. Apparently, there is
currently no Blu-Ray disc available. <br>
<br>
- Is it technically correct to label the DVD as NTSC when the
image displayed is 16:9? <br>
<br>
- What's the likely resolution/format? Any suggestions on how
I could have confirmed that without asking you? <br>
<br>
Many thanks, <br>
Steve <br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>