<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16506"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV>ok...</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>remember the old TELEVISION AND RADIO AGE?</DIV>
<DIV>great info....</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 10/27/2013 11:06:01 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
alan@snugglebunny.us writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial><BR>I
wonder how long it'll be before B&C goes the way of BE, BM/E,
<BR>Television Week, and others? There's so little content left in B&C,
and <BR>much of it resembles "People" magazine, but with just broadcasting
folk. <BR>Virtually nothing left for those interested in local markets, and
the <BR>classified advertising is almost nil...<BR><BR>Alan<BR><BR>On
10/27/2013 12:10 PM, bill.spencer@northstarstudios.tv wrote:<BR>> Between
BE and<BR>> Broadcasting magazine (later to become Broadcasting &
Cable) was where<BR>> you looked for jobs in the broadcasting industry back
in the 60s and<BR>>
70s.<BR><BR><BR>______________________________________________<BR>Please trim
posts to relevant info when replying.<BR><BR>Change subject to reflect thread
direction.
Thanks.<BR>_______________________________________________<BR><BR>Send
QuadList list posts to QuadList@quadvideotapegroup.com<BR>Your subscribe,
unsubscribe and digest options are
here:<BR>http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>